Get your facts correct. Watkins & Eager did not draft the contract. WE was not representing Hattiesburg until long after the lower court ruled.
You should have had your secretary proof your post . . .WE were . . . 😉
WE = Watkins Eager –
Mr. Keith Turner, you represented the city while we were meeting our limits month after month. All the while outr politicians were promoting the need to build a spray system and subsequent mechanical plant we didn’t need. WHERE WERE YOU?
What did your firm do to alert council and MDEQ that we had been meeting Phase II 2015 permit limits for almost a year?
So we get an unconstitutional contract with Brunini and your firm ignored water test results that could have stopped the unnecessary system in its tracks.
You must be logged in to post a comment.